Endometriosis, by the numbers

If you have this disease, or think you might, or love someone who does, you deserve the real numbers in plain words. Every figure here links to where it came from and says how strong the evidence is. No ads, nothing for sale, nothing tracked. Updated 22 September 2026, and re-checked against new studies every week.

This site is written for women, and for the people who love and treat them. It is information, not medical advice, and it cannot diagnose you. Every number links to the study it came from, and we say how strong each one is. Please take what you find here to a clinician; do not use it instead of one. If you are in severe pain or bleeding heavily, seek care now.
What you can actually get →The FDA-approved treatments, the studies recruiting on ClinicalTrials.gov, and what is still being built — kept honestly apart.

Start where you are

Where are you right now? Pick the one that fits and we will take you to the part that matters most today.

This is not fair, and here is the proof

Before the numbers, the part that is not fair. One woman of reproductive age in ten has this disease. Here is how medicine has treated it, with the receipts.

4 to 11 years

is how long a woman waits, on average, from her first symptoms to a name for them, depending on the study. In France in 2026 the wait was ten years. Most were told their pain was normal.

ACOG, 2026 · ComPaRe cohort, France, 2026

$2

a year is what the US National Institutes of Health spent on research per woman with endometriosis in 2022. Crohn's disease got about $130 per patient, diabetes about $31 per woman.

npj Women's Health, 2024

3 in 4

is how often the money favours men. When a disease mostly affects one sex, in nearly three quarters of cases the funding pattern favours the male-dominant one, once you account for how much suffering each disease causes. Endometriosis is among the most underfunded of all.

Mirin, Journal of Women's Health, 2021

8 in 10

women who have surgery for this disease are operated on by a surgeon who does six or fewer of these operations a year. The busiest surgeons have the fewest complications and the fewest repeat operations.

83,787 patients, Ontario, 2025

1993

is the year the United States made it law to include women in medical research. Before that, women of childbearing age were routinely left out of drug trials. The male body was the default patient for most of the century in which this disease was studied.

NIH Office of Research on Women's Health

4 h 25 min

a day is the unpaid care work the average woman does, against 1 hour 23 minutes for a man. A woman with this disease is usually carrying that load through the pain, and being told to manage her stress.

International Labour Organization

Our working explanation, and what would prove it wrong

We are testing a simple explanation: this disease was neglected because it only happens to women, and medicine was built by and for men. It is a hypothesis, so we wrote down what would prove it wrong. If funding matched suffering equally for men's and women's diseases, we would drop it. So far the numbers above say we should keep it.

One fact cuts the other way, and we will not hide it. Gynaecology has been a majority-female profession since 2008 and is about 59% women today. The wait for a diagnosis and the research money did not move when the profession did. So if neglect is the story, it sits upstream of your gynaecologist: in who decides what gets funded, and in what every doctor was taught. OB/GYN workforce study, 2025

None of this is your fault, and none of it is your doctor's fault alone. It does mean you will often have to bring the facts into the room yourself. That is what this page is for.

The five numbers to know

1 in 10

women of reproductive age have endometriosis, about 190 million people worldwide.

World Health Organization

4–11 years

is the average wait from first symptoms to a diagnosis, across studies. A French cohort published in 2026 put it at 10 years.

ACOG, 2026 · ComPaRe cohort, France, 2026

45%

of the women given only a diagnostic look, with no treatment, had visibly worse disease six months later (a 39-woman trial). In 22% it had improved on its own.

Abbott, placebo-controlled trial of 39 women, 2004

40–50%

have the disease come back within five years of conservative surgery; about one in five within two years.

Guo, review of published series, 2009

$2

per patient per year is what the US National Institutes of Health spent on endometriosis research in 2022, against about $130 per patient for Crohn's disease — 65 times more.

npj Women's Health, 2024

Ten years, or six weeks

The gap between what is possible and what most women get.

In the one trial that watched untreated disease under a blinded second look, it had progressed in 45% of the untreated women at six months (39 women in the trial). Nobody has measured what a decade of waiting costs; that is part of the problem. Source.

ACOG 2026 · ComPaRe cohort 2026 (France, 10 years) · Bryan Johnson, July 2026 · the affordable path, below

Could this be me?

No quiz can diagnose endometriosis, and this is not one. But a set of self-reported symptoms separated women with and without it well in one study (AUC 0.94 — a measure of ranking, not a hit rate), and these are the questions that mattered most. Tick what is true for you. If several are, it is worth saying the word to a clinician.

Tick what is true for you.

The symptom model behind this list has not yet been validated outside the study that built it. Non-surgical tests (blood, saliva, expert ultrasound) now exist and are the thing to ask about. Scientific Reports, 2023

For parents: catching it at 14, not 30

About two thirds of women with endometriosis had symptoms before they were 20, and 38% before 15 (figures from a patient association's members, not every woman with the disease). Most were told it was normal. This is what a parent can watch for, and what to ask.

2020 review quoting the two-thirds figure · Endometriosis Australia, quoting the 38%

Is this me? →Nine questions and seven boxes, her pattern next to what diagnosed women reported, and a page for the doctor written in her voice. Nothing stored, no account.

The red flags

The red flags the guidelines name. One is worth a conversation; two or more are worth an appointment with someone who sees a lot of teenagers.

Tick what you have seen.

What to do

What to do, in the order the evidence supports:

  1. Start a simple pain and period diary on her phone. Dates, pain out of 10, days missed. Three months of it is the most useful thing you can bring to a doctor.
  2. Say the word to the doctor: 'Could this be endometriosis?' Ask for someone experienced with adolescents.
  3. The European guideline's first-line treatment for teenagers is hormonal contraception or a progestogen, plus anti-inflammatory painkillers, begun without waiting for a surgical diagnosis. Ask whether it applies to her.
  4. If there is no real improvement after 3 to 6 months, ask for investigation, not a stronger painkiller. The European guideline asks for an ultrasound by someone trained in endometriosis where appropriate; if an internal scan is not appropriate for her, it says MRI or an abdominal scan may be considered.
  5. Ask whether a non-surgical test (blood or saliva) is available where you live. They are new and not yet validated in teenagers, so ask, do not assume.
  6. Keep her moving, sleeping and in school as much as pain allows; pelvic physiotherapy and pain psychology have drug-sized effects in trials, without a drug's side effects.

ESHRE guideline 2022, adolescents · ACOG Committee Opinion 760, 2018 (since replaced) · ACOG guideline 2026 (press release) · adolescent imaging review · PPEP Talk schools programme

What surgery does, and does not do

Surgery is real medicine for this disease and most women who have it say it was the right decision. It is also a treatment for a lifelong condition that is often delivered as a one-off. Here is what the studies actually show.

QuestionAnswerSource
Does surgery work?Yes. 80% improved after excision vs 32% after a sham operation — one of two placebo-controlled trials (the other, Sutton 1994, laser ablation, found 63% vs 23%); about 30% of the benefit is a placebo responseAbbott 2004 · Sutton 1994
How many diagnosed women end up having surgery?About 71% — US insurance records of 77,000 women; for many, the operation was how the diagnosis was made. Only 42–45% were ever prescribed a disease medication (study co-authored by Bayer employees)10-year US claims analysis, 2025
What kind of first surgery?Laparoscopy 53–58%; hysterectomy 42–47% — US hysterectomies for endometriosis fell from about 240,000 in 2002 to 83,000 in 2010 (−65%) as other options spreadsame; Wright et al., Obstetrics & Gynecology 2013 (all US inpatient hysterectomies 1998–2010)
Will it come back?It comes back in about 21% by 2 years and 40–50% by 5 years — recurrence of the disease, not only pain; few risk factors have been consistently identifiedGuo, review of published series, 2009
Will I need another operation?27–58% do; 28% within 10 years in a 1,092-woman series — median gap between operations is 30–36 months; 1 in 20 women has had 3 or moreFertility and Sterility 2023
Does age matter?Recurrence after cyst surgery: 43% at 20–29, 22% at 30–39, 10% at 40–45 — the more cycles ahead of you, the more often it returns; this is why hormonal rest afterwards mattersmeta-analysis of 3,125 patients
Does a hysterectomy end it?Not always. With ovaries kept, re-operation is 6–8 times more likely (62% vs 10% in one series) — the disease runs on ovarian estrogen; chronic pelvic pain persists after 5–32% of benign hysterectomiesHuman Reproduction Update
Does it matter who operates?Yes. 80% of women are operated on by surgeons doing 6 or fewer cases a year; the highest-volume surgeons have the lowest complications (5.5%) and fewer re-operations — 83,787 patients in OntarioJMIG 2025
Excision or ablation?The European guideline says surgeons 'may consider excision instead of ablation' — ESHRE 2022: a weak recommendation on low-quality evidence; recurrence is lower after excision, pain at 12 months similar in small trialsESHRE guideline 2022
What stops it coming back after surgery?Hormonal rest: a long-acting progestogen, an IUD or the pill held a 40% pain improvement at 3 years, with fewer repeat surgeries — 405 women, randomisedPRE-EMPT trial 2024
Do women regret it?16% report some regret; 90% say it was the right decision; 87% would do it again — 154 women after excision surgeryJMIG 2020
What about opioids?62% of newly diagnosed US women fill an opioid prescription in year one — guidelines give opioids a minimal role; endometriosis accounts for a quarter of opioids prescribed by US gynaecologistsclaims study 2020

Why it comes back: the cycles still ahead of you

After surgery for an ovarian cyst, how often it comes back depends most on how many cycles are still ahead of you.

meta-analysis of 3,125 patients

Six questions to ask before anyone operates

  1. How many endometriosis operations do you personally do a year? (Outcomes are best above 24.)
  2. Will you excise (cut out) the lesions or ablate (burn) them? The European guideline says surgeons 'may consider excision instead of ablation'.
  3. If the disease is on my bowel or bladder, who else will be in the room? (Expert centres plan with a bowel surgeon and urologist.)
  4. What is the plan the day after surgery to stop it coming back? (Ask about hormonal rest: an IUD, a long-acting progestogen, or the pill.)
  5. Will I have a nurse or coordinator I can call, and a referral to pelvic physiotherapy and pain psychology?
  6. If a hysterectomy is proposed: what happens to my ovaries, and what does that change about recurrence?

What else helps, with the evidence behind it

OptionWhat the studies foundHow sureSource
Hormonal rest after surgery~40% pain improvement held at 3 years; fewer repeat operations on the long-acting arm (405 women)strongPRE-EMPT 2024
Pelvic physiotherapyLargest effect of any non-drug option across 33 trials (SMD −1.44 vs usual care); best for period painmoderatenetwork meta-analysis 2026
AcupunctureSMD −1.27 overall; the top-ranked option for pelvic pain in the same analysismoderatenetwork meta-analysis 2026
Psychological therapySMD −1.22 vs usual care; pain is partly nervous-system wiring, and this is how you treat wiringmoderatenetwork meta-analysis 2026
GnRH antagonists with add-back (elagolix, relugolix)Non-inferior to dienogest; relief within a month; bone loss controlled by add-back; ~10–13% stop for side effectsstrongsystematic review 2025
Heat (a heating pad)In period pain generally, not tested in endometriosis: beat painkillers in 3 randomised trials of primary dysmenorrhoea and beat no treatment by 4 points on a 10-point scaleweak (indirect)Scientific Reports meta-analysis 2018
MelatoninPain down ~40% in one RCT; a 2025 triple-blind RCT found large effects on pain and sleepmoderateSchwertner 2013; PLOS One 2025
A self-management appQuality of life improved in 9 of 10 measures within 2 weeks (122 women, randomised pilot)weakEndo-App pilot 2024
Diet changes (low-nickel if nickel-sensitive; less red meat)Red meat >2 servings/day linked to 56% higher risk; low-nickel diet eased symptoms in an uncontrolled pilotweakAJOG 2018; Nutrients 2020
Non-hormonal drugs in trialsFirst non-hormonal candidate cleared for Phase 1 (Mar 2026); dichloroacetate trial recruiting late 2026; antibiotic trial running in JapanweakContemporary OB/GYN 2026

Your nervous system is part of this

Part of this disease lives in the nervous system, and that part is treatable in its own right.

This is why pain psychology and pelvic physiotherapy show drug-sized effects in trials, why sleep and rest are treatment and not indulgence, and why a surgeon who removes every lesion can still leave a woman in pain. Ask for the nervous system to be treated alongside the lesions, not instead of them.

Finding it for $300, not $5,000

Most women do not need an MRI to find this disease; guidelines use it to map deep disease and plan surgery. A cheaper path exists in pieces today; nobody has assembled it. Per 1,000 women with pelvic pain:

StepWhatWho reaches itCost today → target
FreeSymptom + cycle + wearable temperature check, in an app1,000 of 1,000$0
~$100Blood test (today a clinic draw; a home kit is the target)600 of 1,000$499 today (HerResolve); €800 (Endotest); ~$100 at scale
~$250Ultrasound by a trained nurse, AI as second reader400 of 1,000$250–600 today
~$1,500MRI, only to plan surgery150 of 1,000$500–3,500
About $960 per confirmed diagnosis, about $300 before anyone needs a scanner, against $5,000–15,000 for a diagnostic operation.

The 1,000 → 600 → 400 → 150 counts are illustrative arithmetic, not measurements: they assume that roughly four in ten women referred with pelvic pain have the disease and that each cheaper step clears the women who do not need the next one. No study has run this path end to end.

HerResolve price · Endotest reimbursement · AI-assisted ultrasound · US MRI prices

Who is using AI on this disease right now

A lot has changed in the last two years, and most of it has not reached the waiting room yet. Here is who is using artificial intelligence on this disease right now, what they have shown, and what to watch for. We keep this list honest: a press release is not a result.

WhoWhat they are doingWhat to watch for
Flo Health, with the London School of Hygiene
Finding itMarch 2026
A symptom checker inside a period-tracking app. A published model estimates it could cut the average wait for a diagnosis from about seven years to about three, saving roughly $5,000 per woman over a lifetime.a real-world study, not a model, showing women actually got diagnosed sooner
Kate Tolo and Bryan Johnson
Finding itJuly 2026
One woman, 14 million data points, 50 devices. Diagnosed in 42 days by combining imaging, blood and AI, against the usual six to ten years. Money was no object.whether anything in her protocol works for a woman with $300, not $2 million a year
HerAnova (HerResolve)
Blood teston sale since December 2025
An AI model reads three microRNAs, three proteins, one hormone, plus age and BMI, from a blood draw. $499. A study for the US regulator is running.independent validation in women who have not yet been diagnosed, and an insurer paying for it
Ziwig (Endotest)
Saliva testin use in Europe; French reimbursement 2025
A saliva sample, 109 microRNAs, an AI model. Reported 96.6% accuracy in 971 women. Approved in Europe; France moved to pay for it.results in ordinary clinics rather than the centres that built it
Aspira Women's Health (ENDOinform)
Blood testlab built Q2 2026
An AI-enabled blood test combining proteins, microRNA and medical history, designed to find the disease at any stage and location.published performance numbers; none yet
Radiologists, worldwide
Ultrasound and MRI2025 to 2026
Deep-learning models reading pelvic ultrasound reach about 90% accuracy and match or beat human readers for ovarian disease; an AI reading aid for MRI of deep disease was built in 2025. A 2026 review says most are not yet ready for clinics.AI as a second reader that lets a trained nurse, not only a specialist, run the scan
Deep Origin and Arctoris (UK ARIA grant)
New medicines2026
An AI that has read three million papers, paired with a robot laboratory, hunting a new drug target. Its own analysis ranked endometriosis the biggest unmet need in women's health.a validated target by the end of 2026, as promised
Insilico Medicine
New medicines2025
AI target discovery named two new targets (GBP2, HCK) and one existing drug to repurpose (ITGB2 blockers) for endometriosis.any of the three reaching a human trial
Academic drug-repositioning groups
New medicines2025
A computer search of gene-expression data flagged two cheap old drugs, simvastatin and primaquine, as candidates for endometriosis pain.a trial; old drugs are cheap to test and nobody profits, so this may need public money
University of Edinburgh (ENDO1000)
Understanding it2025 to 2027
1,000 women in the UK tracking pain, cycles, sleep, diet and temperature through an app and wearables for two years, with home blood, saliva and stool samples, analysed with machine learning.the first dataset big enough to test the temperature and flow ideas on this page
Columbia University (Phendo)
Understanding itongoing
A research app that learns from women's own tracking and can tell an undiagnosed woman whether her pattern looks like endometriosis.whether the signal holds up in women who never went on to be diagnosed

And the chatbots? You can ask one about this disease tonight, and many women do. Here is how they score.

So: ask the chatbot, and then check it here. A chatbot gives you an answer with no source and a different one tomorrow. This page gives you the number, the study it came from, how strong it is, and the exact question to ask in the room.

Beyond AI, the trials and programmes most likely to change what happens to you in the next few years.

Show the 7 projects
WhoWhatWhat to watch
Nagoya University Hospital, JapanAntibiotic treatment aimed at Fusobacterium, found in 64% of patients' uteri vs 7% of controls (trial ENDS, NCT06368596)a positive result makes part of the disease an infection, and infections are curable
Proteomics International (PromarkerEndo)10-protein blood test, 83% sensitivity, 95% specificity in 436 casesUS launch after Australia; FDA plans not stated in the source
EndoCyclic Therapeutics (ENDO-205)First non-hormonal drug candidate; FDA cleared Phase 1 in March 2026top-line results expected 2027
University of Edinburgh (EPiC2)Dichloroacetate, a cheap metabolic drug, placebo-controlledrecruitment starts late 2026
Feinstein Institutes (ROSE study)3,700 women giving menstrual blood to build a non-surgical testNIH-backed; a tampon-based test
Pelvic Pain Foundation of Australia (PPEP Talk)School programme reaching 110,000 students; 52.6% report severe period painthe model for finding the disease at 15 instead of 30
This pageFifteen explanations, each with a written test that would prove it wrong; new papers pulled weekly (18 so far, not yet published as a list); no prediction graded yetthe ranking changing as evidence arrives

Where the flow stalls

One idea keeps turning up when you look at where this disease settles: where the fluid stalls, the disease grows. It is not proven as a cause. It is where the lesions are.

Flow explains where the disease sits. Whether stagnation creates it is an open question we are testing, and we have written down what would settle it.

Salt in, water out: a thesis we are testing

Here is a thesis we are taking seriously and testing in the open. Your body is mostly water, and water follows salt. For almost all of human history salt was rare and plants were plentiful, so we ate about sixteen times more potassium than sodium. Today it is the other way round. What does that do to a system that depends on fluid moving?

What actually moves water in the body, graded honestly:

Salt holds

Water follows sodium. Extra salt pulls water into the blood and the spaces between cells and raises pressure; the kidneys then work to shed both. The Tehran study found no sodium difference in endometriosis, so this is a general truth without a disease-specific result yet. Source

The pill and hormones runs the other way

Oestrogen makes the body hold water and sodium, not shed it. The pill, pregnancy and the high-oestrogen days of the cycle all retain fluid. Where the pill acts on this disease is on how many periods you have, not on dryness. Source

Antibiotics indirect

They do not dry tissue. They act on the gut bacteria, and in mice that runs both ways: broad-spectrum antibiotics shrank lesions about five-fold, while the bacteria themselves were needed for lesions to grow. In women it is untested. The flow effect, if any, is through inflammation. Source

Paracetamol (Tylenol) no fluid effect known

Its known link is prenatal: daughters of women who took it in pregnancy had smaller ovaries, fewer follicles and smaller uteri in infancy in one 2026 cohort. It does not move water in any measured way. Source

Childbirth temporary

Birth costs about half a litre of blood and a large fluid shift, then recovers over weeks. The lasting effect of pregnancy on this disease is the opposite of harm: every pregnancy and every month of breastfeeding lowers risk, because periods stop. Source

What gets cool, nutrient-rich fluid moving, with the evidence:

Two honest cautions. First, this thesis is graded weak on our board: one small human study points the right way, and the salt half has no disease-specific result yet. We wrote down the test that would settle it: a 24-hour urine sodium-to-potassium measurement in newly diagnosed women against matched controls, which is cheap and objective. Second, potassium as a supplement can be dangerous for anyone with kidney trouble; get it from food, and ask a clinician before taking pills. Potassium and kidney safety.

What science currently says about the cause

Nobody knows the cause for certain. Below is the current ranking of explanations, scored from 114 published findings by a fixed rule: bigger, better-designed studies count more, and evidence against a theory subtracts. The score is arithmetic, not opinion, and it changes when new studies arrive.

#ExplanationEvidenceHow sure
1Too many spills
Modern life quadrupled lifetime menstrual cycles (~100 → 400+) and each cycle seeds the pelvis; the clean-up capacity did not grow
22 for, 1 againststrong
2Seeded before birth
Ectopic lining tissue is laid down in the womb in ~10% of female fetuses; what the mother and infant took in shapes it; adult estrogen lights the fuse
12 for, 0 againststrong
3Partly a pain-wiring disease
Half of risk is inherited, and the genes overlap with migraine and chronic pain; some of what women suffer is nervous-system wiring, not lesion size
11 for, 0 againststrong
4The clean-up crew fails
The immune cells that should clear stray tissue are sluggish and the uterus lining itself is inflamed and progesterone-resistant; the body's own defence is part of the disease
13 for, 0 againststrong
5The uterus injures itself
A self-perpetuating mechanical loop: uterine hyper-contraction → micro-injury at the lining–muscle border → local estrogen → more contraction; obstructed outflow forces the same thing
11 for, 0 againststrong
6Something ingested
A medication or something eaten is causing it; true for estrogenic drugs (DES in the womb, estrogen therapy in men) and infant soy formula; no evidence for common non-hormonal drugs
7 for, 1 againststrong
7An infection nobody looked for
A mouth-and-gut bacterium (Fusobacterium) and gut-derived endotoxin in menstrual blood teach lining cells to scar and dig in; part of the disease may be treatable with antibiotics
5 for, 0 againstmoderate
8Heat inside the body
A temperature or thermal-stress disturbance is involved; 1980s work found a distinctive basal-temperature signature, and heat-shock (cell stress) proteins are raised, but no evidence yet that heat causes the disease
9 for, 1 againstmoderate
9Stress re-wires the system
Chronic stress and early trauma change immune tone, pain wiring and hormone rhythm; the captive-baboon effect and the abuse dose-response point the same way
4 for, 0 againstmoderate
10The estrogen leak
Chemicals that mimic or boost estrogen (PFAS, persistent pesticides, dioxins, the weedkiller atrazine, pharmaceutical estrogens in water) feed a disease that runs on estrogen
13 for, 7 againstmoderate
11The cells were already there
Lining-type cells can arise in place from the pelvic lining or stem cells, or travel by blood and lymph; the disease occurs in women with no uterus and in men on estrogen
7 for, 0 againstmoderate
12Where fluid stalls, disease grows
Lesions form where pelvic fluid pools and slows (behind the sigmoid colon, in the recesses), and stagnant veins and lymph travel with the disease; flow is protective
7 for, 0 againstmoderate
13Neglected because it is a women's disease
Research money follows the burdens the funders recognise; when funders and the profession were mostly men, diseases that only women get were under-recognised, and the pattern outlived the people who set it
4 for, 0 againstweak
14Salt in, water out: the sodium-potassium imbalance
Modern diets carry far more sodium and far less potassium and magnesium than the bodies we evolved in expect; water follows salt, so tissues run drier and stiffer, flow slows, and the pelvis pays
4 for, 1 againstweak
15The record is already in the drawer: baby teeth as a time-stamped log of exposure before birth
Baby teeth mineralise in weekly rings from about 20 weeks in the womb to roughly age one and lock in whatever chemistry the child was exposed to. If endometriosis is seeded before birth (H2/H8 developmental-origins line), the exposure fingerprint of women later diagnosed should differ from their sisters' and peers' — and millions of parents have kept those teeth.
0 for, 0 againstspeculative

Every study behind this ranking, with its link, its design and its points: the full list of studies.

The ranking, drawn

Facts any explanation has to survive

Why we believe a real answer is possible

Why we think a real answer is possible. Trigeminal neuralgia is a facial pain so severe it has been called the most painful condition known to medicine, and for decades it was nicknamed the suicide disease. It strikes about four to five people in every 100,000 each year, more often women, and rises with age. A single episode can make eating, speaking, brushing teeth or a breeze on the cheek unbearable. For most of the twentieth century it was managed with drugs that dulled the pain and the person. Then surgeons found the cause in most cases: a blood vessel pressing on the nerve where it leaves the brainstem. They learned to lift the vessel off and tuck a small pad between them.

People go from not being able to eat, speak or live a normal life to essentially pain-free, because somebody looked for the cause instead of managing the symptom. Endometriosis affects more than a hundred times as many people than trigeminal neuralgia and has never had that look at the scale it deserves. There is room for optimism here; that is what the money, and this page, are for.

If you are a clinician

If you are a clinician, thank you for reading this far. Your patient may bring this page. Here is what the guidelines and the trials say she is entitled to ask for.

  1. Name it early. A first-degree relative, cyclical bowel or bladder pain, deep dyspareunia, or dysmenorrhoea that fails 3 to 6 months of NSAIDs and hormonal treatment is the pattern; the European guideline says treat empirically without waiting for laparoscopy, including in adolescents. ESHRE 2022
  2. Ultrasound by someone trained in endometriosis, and in younger teenagers MRI over a transvaginal probe. Non-surgical blood and saliva tests exist and are not yet validated in adolescents. adolescent imaging review
  3. Refer surgical cases by volume. Eighty percent of operations are done by surgeons doing six or fewer a year; outcomes are best above about 24. Ontario cohort, 2025
  4. Plan the day after surgery before the day of it: long-acting progestogen, IUD or the pill held a 40% pain improvement at three years with fewer re-operations. PRE-EMPT, 2024
  5. Treat the nervous system alongside the lesions. Central sensitisation is present in 41 to 52% of patients; pelvic physiotherapy, acupuncture and psychological therapy show drug-sized effects. network meta-analysis, 2026

Bring this to your appointment

Show this section on your phone. It is what the evidence says to ask for; the Mirror turns it into a letter in your own words that prints on its own.

  1. Say the word: 'I think this could be endometriosis.' Diagnosis is delayed most when nobody names it.
  2. Ask for an ultrasound by someone trained in endometriosis, and ask whether a blood or saliva test is available where you live.
  3. If surgery is proposed, ask the six questions above, starting with how many of these operations the surgeon does a year.
  4. Ask what happens the day after surgery to stop it coming back.
  5. Ask for referrals to pelvic physiotherapy and pain psychology; their effect sizes are drug-sized.
  6. If you are offered opioids as the plan, ask what the plan is instead.

How this page is different

There are good endometriosis websites, and there are chatbots. Why this one?

  1. Every number on this page links to the study it came from and says how strong it is. Nothing is typed from memory.
  2. We rank the possible causes by a fixed arithmetic rule, not by opinion, and the ranking changes when new studies arrive. A weekly job pulls the new papers; a person still has to read each one before it counts, and the list itself is not yet published.
  3. For every explanation we wrote down in advance what would prove it wrong. None has been graded yet. When one is — right or wrong — it will say so here.
  4. It starts where you are: a parent, a woman who suspects, a woman facing surgery, a woman whose disease came back, a clinician.
  5. It gives you the exact questions to ask, not just the facts. The six surgery questions alone can change an outcome.
  6. No ads, nothing for sale, no account, no tracking. Your ticks stay on your phone.

Pass it on

One woman of reproductive age in ten has this. The woman who needs this page tonight is already in your contacts, and she has probably been told her pain is normal. Sending her the surgery questions, or the parents' red flags, costs you ten seconds and may save her years.

If this page helped, the fastest way to help another woman is to send it. Everything here is free to copy with a link back.

Endometriosis, by the numbers: what surgery does and does not do, how to find it years sooner, and the questions to ask, with every source linked.
Text itWhatsAppEmail it

How this page is made, and what it is not

This page is built from a public list of studies in which every paper is filed with its link, its design and the explanation it supports or undermines. A fixed rule scores the explanations; a weekly job pulls the new papers, and the ranking changes when one is read and filed. We write down what would prove each explanation wrong before the evidence arrives; none has been graded yet, and when one is, the grade will appear here. Your ticks on this page stay on this page; nothing is stored or sent anywhere. The page carries no advertising, sells nothing, and is not a substitute for a clinician. It is made by a small team that came to this disease through people we love, not through medicine, which is why every claim carries its source.